A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration Community members shall conduct.We’ve heard from Peer Software customers that Peer Software discontinued PeerSync. So might be part of the logon script that says - if you're on the LAN, use a standard SMB share - if you're not on the LAN (but still somehow running a logon script), use a WEBDAV share.Smb Client For Windows Mac Os Smb Version. New 3.0) has much more effective client-side caching so performance of WebDAV is a question 'numero uno'.While it’s an excellent Finder replacement, the app can do more than replace Finder. Moving to Resilio Connect from PeerSync is straightforward and provides a superior, price-competitive alternative to PeerGFS, for most use cases.Path Finder 9 is another two-pane file manager for macOS. If your company is on PeerSync and considering PeerGFS, we encourage you to also take a look at Resilio Connect.
Replacement Smb Client Mac Os SmbTo Cloudflare, replacing the smb.site.com and 445 values with your site and port.At first glance, Resilio Connect and Peer Software’s (Peer Software, Inc.) PeerGFS seem like similar products. Of course, we’ve done our best to be objective as we highlighted the key differentiators of Resilio Connect.The Server Message Block (SMB) protocol allows users to access, read. Full warning, though: Path Finder has not kept things that simple.This blog compares and contrasts some of the key capabilities offered by Peer Software in PeerGFS and Resilio Connect. It also packs so many options that make it our Upgrade Pick. Peer-to-Peer (P2P) vs Point-to-Point architecture. Architecturally, the approaches between PeerSoftware PeerGFS and Resilio Connect are fundamentally different.Resilio Connect distinguishes itself from PeerGFS in a number of ways, including: Resilio supports running agents on Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, BSD, and some NAS operating systems. And both companies support using cloud storage for cloud backup, online backup and business continuity.Well, actually, PeerGFS only supports Windows. Both companies claim to work with existing file servers, storage environments, and cloud environments. Both companies support distribution, ingest, and “real-time synchronization”. Simply increasing the transfer speed leads to faster delivery of the files. This P2P architecture utilizes network capacity among all machines (agents) into a single meshed network, which is significantly faster than PeerGFS. Connect combines peer-to-peer and WAN optimized protocols and splits files into blocks and sends them concurrently and independently to several destinations. Resilio excels in reliably scaling out data movement at network speeds, by utilizing all agents participating in a file replication job such as file synchronization. Peer Software (somewhat ironically, considering the name) employs a “point-to-point” architecture. Resilio encourages customers to thoroughly evaluate any file locking software or SaaS (provided by Peer Software or another Global File System vendor such as Nasuni, Panzura, LucidLink, or Ctera) in an extended POC. Depending on the use case, customers should consider the consequences of deploying a file locking solution on top of their diversity of applications, operating systems, and use cases. PeerGFS provides a proprietary file locking capability built in to PeerGFS (the successor to its PeerLock product). File locking, in the Resilio model, is provided by the application and/or operating system being deployed by the customer. Gamecube emulator mac twilight princessResilio is the hands-down winner here. Synchronization flexibility – uni- , bi- , and multi-directional n-way or full mesh. In the case of Resilio, automation can be configured in the UI, scripted, or managed through a well documented API. Resilio enables automation for all jobs (distribution/replication, ingest/consolidation, and synchronization). Automation. Both vendors offer some level of automation. This comes in handy both when using unreliable networks (VSAT, LTE/5G, WiFI) and scaling to support high-speed networks such as 1-10Gbps and even 100Gpbs networks. Turnkey multi-cloud provider support for file management across Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google GCP, Wasabi, Backblaze, among others. In multi-site or wide area network deployments, for example, Resilio ensures files can always be replicated at predictable rates no matter the bandwidth data is hashed across all agents participating in the replication, synchronization, consolidation, etc. What differentiates Resilio Connect from PeerGFS is Resilio’s Peer-to-Peer (P2P) architecture combined with turnkey network optimization, automation, centralized monitoring, and N-way synchronization flexibility. Like PeerGFS, Resilio Connect is a good alterative to DFSR for DFSN. Resilio is arguably a superior DFSR alternative. Any storage type is supported (Dell EMC, NetApp, Nutanix, IBM, HPE, et al.) The Resilio Connect Cloud Storage Gateway can be used as an intermediary cache. Selective Sync is a key feature that enables end users to efficiently download and/or synchronize only the files they need. Conversely, a Resilio Connect Storage Gateway may also be used as an efficient caching gateway. Resilio agents (running an any number of devices and operating systems) can efficiently transfer files into and out of any supported cloud vendor. Resilio sales and support – Resilio is friendly and easy to work with as a company.There are a number of use cases to consider when comparing Resilio Connect to PeerSoft PeerGFS. At least that’s what Resilio customers have told us. Price competitive – Depending on the use case, PeerGFS may be cost-prohibitive for certain customers. The Gateway supports SMB and NFS, for example, in situations where local on-premise users or applications require fast file sharing or specifically need to use SMB or NFS. Resilio wins here, big time. What about the diversity of Apple Mac, Android, and Linux devices that may also need to share or move data? Use cases like remote work, multi-site collaboration and sync, and interfacing with cloud storage demand a flexible cross-platform solution supporting diverse operating systems, natively. Cross-platform OS Support (Resilio Wins)Imagine deploying a global file services solution across your Enterprise and only being able to support Windows. Volume-based discounts available. The solution is agent-based and can be licensed based on the number of agents and type of agents. Resilio Connect Price-competitive easy replacement for PeerSync (Resilio Wins)Resilio Connect is priced aggressively to accommodate a range of deployment options for Peer Software customers. Multi-directional Server-to-Server Sync (Resilio Wins)In cases where high performance data replication is required, Resilio Connect can synchronize many servers at wire speed or at a given bandwidth allocation. Some Resilio customers are transferring and/or synchronizing millions of files, daily. Resilio Connect continuously optimizes for larger capacity file systems with extreme numbers of files of any size and type.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorTammy ArchivesCategories |